Archive for May, 2008

Dear FashCon Members,

The unremitting rise in Content Theft in SL has made it necessary for Fashion Consolidated to firm up its policies on piracy and also  businesses in a box.  What follows isn’t perfect, but it’s the best we’ve got right now:

  • Avatars who have had DMCA take-down orders successfully filed against them will be removed permanently from Fashion Consolidated vendor status.
  • This removal from vendor status will occur even if the selling avatar has legitimate content in her or his store, and regardless of claimed ignorance that the content was stolen – this is subjective, and unprovable.
  • Resellers (people who buy things from others to sell or use businesses in box) are not original designers and are not considered to be legitimate Fashion Consolidated vendors.  They will also be removed if they sell no legitimate self-designed fashion content.
  • Removal of vendor status is permanent and can only be overturned if all DMCA take-downs are successfully contested with LL.
  • Refunds will not be given for kiosks of removed designers – the rules are clear on joining.

Now, the more lengthy bit about what this means and why we’re doing this and what we wish for to make it better:

First off, content theft is not a casual virtual crime – it’s wilfully stealing the hard work of others for financial gain. Just like any other theft, it’s mean, stupid and unimaginative and should be dealt with swiftly. Designers work and labor and tweak and hone and battle the vagueries of SL to bring us wonderous goodies and deserve to be protected by those who cherish their work – that includes by other designers, buyers, and any connected organisation.

We at Fashion Consolidated receive a number of tips from shoppers that certain stores are selling stolen goods.  Sometimes this turns out to be true, other times not, and – frustratingly – sometimes we never hear from the designers themselves at all about what they think.  Sometimes designers themselves contact us asking us to remove the alleged thieves from our vendor rolls.  We’ve had cases of blatant theft going on undetected, and other cases of what seems to us like screaming blatant theft, but after many hours of investigation turn out to be a false trail – a common source for design, etc.

In all cases, what we need is independent third party confirmation that yes, an item was copied.  We at Fashion Consolidated do not have the expertise to do this evaluation ourselves – really. We’ve tried and all we end up doing is inappropriately attempting to be self-appointed judge and jury, or reinventing the decision making process that even Linden Lab, with all its employees, takes some time to process as designers often discover. Currently, the most standard evaluation we have is this DMCA process run by the Lindens.

Therefore, if the Lindens judge that the evidence is sufficient to accept a DMCA, FashCon’s judgement is that this is sufficient and the only fair course of action to the community is to remove designer rights. If you are a designer who has sucessfully gotten the Lindens to take down the work of a resident – and that resident is marketing through Fashion Consolidated – please send Ivy Norsk (FashCon’s content moderator) a copy of the Linden or OnRez DMCA response about removing items. We will follow suit immediately and the member will immediately and permanently have their vendor status revoked. Note that this works, because, as LL explains, the consequences of a false DMCA are very RL, and very real and will probably involve lawyers. See LL’s page on DMCAs for more details.

Note: yes, we have decided for consistency’s sake that this does apply to past DMCAs against current FashCon vendors. We are aware that this may hit a few people previously successfully DMCA’d as selling stolen content, who say they have tried to “go good,” but we have decided that we cannot maintain a membership where people complain as they are kicked that “so and so did it too, why do they get to stay?” – we need to act with impartiality. So this highlights a very important issue:

If you carry stolen goods, you WILL be removed from FashCon. Ignorance of the nature of the goods you receive is no excuse in RL law, neither is it something the Lindens will forgive you for. Nor will this group. It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that nothing you sell has even the faintest chance of being stolen. If in doubt, DON’T sell it, and report the supplier. If you are DMCA’d for selling such goods, regardless of your naivety, noobness etc, you WILL be removed from FashCon, permanently.

What’s wrong with this?
The Lindens are slooooow.  Also the DMCA process is onerous for designers.  We recognize this and would like to have the option to accept other independent third party evaluations in the future should such an evaluating group arise. But they will have to be recognised by the whole community as good, independent trusted arbiters.

What you should do if you think you see something that you believe is stolen:
Contact the original creator by notecard informing them of the what and the where and the who, so that they can check the situation out quietly.  You can also tell Ivy Norsk, and she will put the alleged thief on her watch list so she is aware this is ongoing, even if it’s impossible to act at this stage. If you can’t resolve the matter, file a DMCA with LL and let Ivy know of the outcome. You must do this to have the offender removed from FashCon. Please don’t tell us it’s obvious theft and we are harbouring thieves if we don’t kick on your own insistence – we have to be fair to all and follow a process. If you are sure you have been stolen from, follow that through: file a DMCA, or suggest that the content creator does, and we will act swiftly and with wrath and vengeance once your case is proven.

If you have been convicted via DMCA and removed from FashCon vendors: do not ask us to restore you, or have mercy. You’ve been found guilty of supporting theft of others’ work by Linden Lab. Your only recourse is to file a counter-DMCA – if that is successful and your innocence proved, your vendor status will be restored.

About BIBs:  Businesses in a Box are often used by thieves to move stolen merchandise or to hide behind.  We have heard “Oh, I got it from a box and I didn’t know” more times than we care to remember.  We know that all of us were once naive and did not know what a BIB was, but we cannot allow the BIB to stand as a bluff, and indeed, marketing wares from a box is not something that a real designer does.  So, if you are a designer and you are reselling a little something from a box, even as a little freebie enticement, get rid of that merchandise.  It can only do your business harm.

On a final note:  Fashion Consolidated is a huge group of about 7500.  It is an open enrollment community and marketing/information service.  Just because a person is a member does not mean that they are a FashCon vendor.  Notes saying “I can’t believe so and so thief is in Fash Con” aren’t meaningful; if they’re a vendor – then it’s a problem.

I hope that this policy will in some small way stem the tide of thievery.  And now that you are done reading we urge you all to get out on the grid and support your favorite content creators with your lindens.


Honey Fairweather & Ivy Norsk
Owner & Content Moderator, Fashion Consolidated

Read Full Post »

Dear chatters,

Q: If we all love fashion and we all love to chat, why not chat on the Fashion Consolidated “chat group” line? That is the question.

A: Well one reason is because it is forbidden. Strictly forbidden.

Q: Why is it forbidden?

A: Because Fashion Consolidated is a huge group, over 6600 people, many of them busy and they do not all want to hear you chat. It is deeply annoying to many.

Q: What does http://fashcon.com/oops mean? Somebody keeps posting that in the middle of our fash con conversation.

A: That’s code for go to the fashcon website to read the rules on being quiet. Basically it is the official way of saying “hush now!” on Fashion Consolidated.

Q: But I have fashion needs! I need to express them and find the answers to my burning questions and I know people out there can answer them.

A: Don’t do it. Sign up for the Fashion Consolidated Cafe group. It was created Just for this purpose. You will feel right at home there. Everybody yaks and blathers very intelligently about shoes and aos and everything under the sun.

Q: But it’s a chat group! The line is for chatting!

A: When Linden Labs set up the groups system they did not envision all of the ways that groups would be used. They did not separate group notices from group chat, figuring that most groups would need both. Fashion Consolidated is a Notice Service. If we could completely disable the group chat we would.

Q: What if I go ahead and chat anyway?

A: If you are a spammer posting advertising slurls you will be immediately ejected from the group. If you are just chatting there because you saw a neat notice or have a fashion question, one of the Fash Con helpers (if they are online) will privately IM you and tell you to stop. If you don’t stop we can eject you too.

Q: You don’t understand – this is an emergency. I’m a designer and I just sent out a notice and I forgot to include the landmark!

A: Stop. Take a deep breath, and whatever you do Don’t post a slurl. Slurls get you kicked and and while we don’t really intend to kick our own designers not all helpers know the names of every single designer in Fashion Consolidated. Do not post. Landmarks are optional in FashCon; people can find your store in search and through your profile picks. It will be okay.

The answers to most problems lie in the Fashion Consolidated Cafe group.


Ivy Norsk

Content Moderator, Fashion Consolidated

Read Full Post »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.